CASE STUDY
INTERNET, PRINT & DESIGN TRANSFORMATION
institutional
Communication
DESIGN
taking stock & Establishing standards
Name
Institutional Communications Design
Industry
Education, Marketing
Type
Brand and Communications Design
Medium
Internet & Print
Duration
Six years, 1999—2005
My Role
User Experience + Interface Design, Creative Design, and Production work.
Scope
Project discovery, definition, design, production, and delivery of press-ready files or web pages as needed.
Constraints
Working with multiple departments needing equitable time and space online.
Deliverables
Website (twice), and all manner of print communications.
Outcome(s)
I provided the bridge from a disorganized and incohesive approach to design to one that matched the institution's approach to education.
Full text and more samples are available on the desktop version of this case study.
Over six years, I consolidated design and production through a "media group" composed of individuals from each department present to voice any concerns over a project. More importantly, I coordinated efforts and streamlined the entire process.
My priority was redesigning the website that launched in 1996. I redesigned the website twice, once in 1999 and again in 2005—and that website stood until 2013.
Meeting with department reps, I became increasingly aware that each group wanted their message to be upfront and the "first." I felt like I was walking a tightrope, trying to please all the departments and make them content with the results.
It was clear that centralizing the design of the website and all communications from a single source was necessary.
The back of the DVD sleeve for the Admissions departments promotional materials.
I began by redesigning, in consultation with the Media Group, all existing materials and producing new materials for the campaign and other projects.
Our team consisted of one person from each department and became known as the "media group" (admissions, development, administration). Other relevant faculty and staff are invited to weigh in when needed.
It was my responsibility to communicate the change in design direction and the reasoning behind having a design guide for communications. I had to sell it to all the internal department stakeholders and the Head of School. Fortunately, it was well received.
Details and images of the Owen Jameson Gift Announcement for the Alumni and Development department.
Capital Campaign announcement mailer for the Alumni and Development department.
On the other hand, the school magazine was a twice-a-year print periodical with longer lead times.
On the digital side of communications with the website, email, and social, the school was an early player, having used the web to promote itself and widespread use of email and on-campus messaging systems before I arrived in 1999.
Both sides of the Capital Campaign announcement for the Alumni and Development department.
"El Archivero's" cover and final appearance for the Student body.
Designs marking 25 years of Co-Education at Thacher, it was initially an all-boys school for the Alumni and Development department.
I learned to balance each department's needs, make them feel heard, hit their objectives, and produce good work. Asking probing questions were critical to unpacking 'reality'—versus simply accepting what people say.
Taking time to dig deep, listening intently, and being open to criticism—were crucial to getting buy-in from all the departments.
I refined my ability to quickly iterate designs and deliver the "next step' in the evolution. Keeping momentum is key to the engagement of the team and stakeholders.
Looking back, I can see my role was transformative for the institution and contributed to the school's growth and success. The school has embraced a better approach to the design and presentation of communications to all its constituent groups.
I constantly listen for—or try to help clients discover—needs they didn’t know they had.
With requirements nailed down, we went into the design phase supported by a condition somewhat unique to private schools: we had comprehensive data on all the constituents; we knew who they were.
We often had tight deadlines, so it was essential to offer versatile ideas. And it was necessary to educate them on a turnaround to provide feedback and approvals quickly.
The website process was essentially the same, initial stakeholder meetings followed by wireframe meetings and walk-throughs to collect feedback, then iterate until there was a consensus from all involved. We would then present an MVP of the website, and once we cleared QA, we published.
Covers from The Thacher News, the school magazine; various page layouts from different issues are below for the Administration and the Alumni and Development department.
Copyright ©MCMXCII–MMXXII — Bert Mahoney.
All rights reserved unless otherwise noted about specific content.
Copyright ©MCMXCII–MMXXII — Bert Mahoney.
All rights reserved unless otherwise noted about specific content.